POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN CONVERSATIONAL DISCOURSE AS A PANACEA FOR EMERGING CONFLICT

Florence Dakoru Anuonye, Chika Queen Ude, Uchechi Rebecca Ukaegbu

Abstract


Conflicts, arguments and change are natural parts of our lives, as well as the lives of every agency, organisation and nation. This means that conflict among men is inevitable and thus pertinent that people know how to avoid it or manage it if it arises. Conflict is not always a bad thing. It can be destructive, leading people to develop negative feelings for each other and spend energy on conflict that could be better spent elsewhere. It can also deepen differences and lead groups to polarise into either positions. Most times, conflict cannot be avoided. So, for peace and development, every conflict should be resolved or managed well. Conflict resolution is a way for two or more parties to find a peaceful solution to a disagreement among them. The disagreement may be personal, financial, political or emotional. However, well-managed conflict can also be constructive, helping to 'clear the air', releasing emotion and stress, and resolving tension. People have different identities and roles, many of which have conflicting demands. These differing identities and roles can be managed in other to avoid conflict. This paper proposes that deployment of politeness in conversation can help people handle conflict. Politeness helps one to avoid offending the other person's feelings and can be the easiest way to avoid tension.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ademola (2012). Theories of Social Conflict: Introduction to Conflict Peace and Conflict

Studies in West Africa.

Akmajian, A.; Demers, R.A.; Farmer, A.K.; Itarnish, R.M.. Linguistics: AN Introduction to

Language and Communication. New Delhi, Prentice – Hall of India Private Limited

(2008).

Best, Shedrack (2004). Protracted Communal Conflict and Conflict Management: The BasaEgbura Conflict in Toto Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria Ibadan:

Academic Ass. Peace Works.

Brown, B.P. and Levinson, S.C. Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage, Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 1978/87.

Brown, P & Levinson, S. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge,

Cambridge University Press (1978/11987).

Fisher, Simon, et al (2000). Working With Conflict: Skills and Strategies for Action. London:

Zed.

Francis David (2007). Uniting Africa: Building Security Systems. Ibadan: Spectrum Books

Ltd.

Fraser, Bruce. “Perspectives on Politeness†Journal of Pragmatics, 1990.

Goffmann, Erving. Interaction Ritual Essays, on Face – to – face behavior, New York,

Garden City, 1967.

Grice, H. Paul “Logic and Conversationâ€. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds), Syntax and

Semantics Vol, 3: Speech Acts, New York, Academic Press (1975, 41 – 58).

Holmes, J. An Introduction of Sociolinguistics. Routledge. London and New York 2013.

Holmes, J. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. England, Pearson Education Limited (2008).

Lakoff, R.I. The Logic of Politeness. Chicago Linguistics Society 1973:9; 292 – 305.

Lee, F. Being polite and keeping MUM: How bad news is communicated in organizational

hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 1124-1149. (1993).

Leech, Geoffrey, Towards an anatomy of politeness in communication. International Journal

of Pragmatics, Berlin Mouton De Gruyter, 2004.

Leech, Geoffrey. Principles of Pragmatic. London, Longman (1983).

Leung, K. and Wu, P. (1990). Dispute Processing: A Cross-cultural Analysis’ Applied Crosscultural Psychology. 209 – 2.

Mills, S. Gender and Politeness, Cambridge; Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Sheridan, Carly Gabrielle. Politeness in Conflict: Identity Management and Politeness

Strategies Used During a Conflict. A Thesis:University of Michigan (2013).

Wardhaugh, R. AN Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford, Blackwell. (2000)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright © 2015-2019. IJAAS. All Rights Reserved.

ISSN:2504-8694, E-ISSN:2635-3709Â