EWE MAJOR STUDENTS’ COMMAND OVER COHESIVE DEVICES: COHESION AND COHERENCE IN THE NATIVE SPEAKERS’ CREATIVE WRITING ESSAYS IN THE UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION, WINNEBA

Emmanuel Dogbey

Abstract


Essay writing in one’s native language or dialect, constitutes a problem for many people including native speakers who are formally studying their language. However, studies conducted in the fields of essay writing at the university levels and below to the best of my knowledge are, quantitative and not in L1. It is a fact that speakers of a language can generally demonstrate the language competence and language performance – thus to ascertain their level of command over the language. Creative writing forms are media for such justifications. Creative writing is ‘a habitual act’ and one of the full semester courses for Level 300 Ghanaian Language students in the University of Education, Winneba (UEW). In Ghana, language problems could be attributed to the nature of the prevailing language policy in the country- not considering effective study and development of local languages alongside the English language -L21 as well as the linguistic background of learners in the formal educational system. We can state that language problems are the causes of major challenges or are among the major challenges in the Ghanaian educational system. Despite numerous approaches to writing, tackling writing in L1 or L2 is still a major problem. In the modern Ghanaian classroom, writing is reduced to taking of tests or copying of notes. Complains alone on any of these challenges will not solve the problem, researching into them counts. This study is therefore, concerned with exploring the organizational problems encountered by native/local language students while composing essays in their own language. It is purposed to examine types of coherent and cohesive devices Ewe major students use in their essay writings. Coherence and cohesion are evaluations essentials in continuous writings. I use the term coherence and cohesion generally to mean two complementary aspects of writing and text organization. Roughly, coherence includes those aspects of a narrative that are directly linked to the overall structure of its content, while cohesion involves those aspects that pertain directly to the linguistic expression of discourse – the internal relation across clauses. Expressing ideas verbally seems easier than putting them into writing. Ideally, people do have depths of ideas running through their minds; the ability to organize and express or present them in written forms is always the major task (Dogbey, 2012:1). Acquiring the writing skill seems to be more laborious and demanding than the other language skills (Ahmed, 2010:211). This proves that writing is as an independent structure on its own and organizing thoughts into codified forms need much attention. In fact, producing a coherent piece of writing in one’s language (which is superficially studied at the foundation levels as is the case of Ghanaian languages offered at the tertiary level) is an enormous challenge. Honestly, the rhetorical conventions of English texts (or L2 texts:---the structure, style, and organization-) differ from students’ L1. A great effort is required by the L2 learner in organizing and managing the differences.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adika, G. S. K. (2003). A theme-structure approach to evaluating aspects of university

students’ expository text. In E.K Osam & G. S. K. Adika (eds.), Legon Journal of the

Humanities (14:55-78). Chen, Jo-Ling (2008). An investigation of EFL

http://nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw/bitstream/987654321/7773/1/07.pdf.

Afful, J. B.A. (2005). “A rhetorical analysis of examination essays in three disciplines: The

case of Ghanaian undergraduatesâ€. Unpublished PhD Thesis. National University of

Singapore.

Agor, T. J. (2003). Investigating English Concord Problems in the writings of TeacherTrainees. Unpublished M.Phil Thesis, University of Ghana.

Agor, T. J. (2010). English writing inadequacies. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of

Ghana.

Ahmed, Abdel, Hamid (2010). Students’ Problem with Cohesion and Coherence in ELF

Essay Writing in Egypt: Different Perspectives. Literacy Information and Computer

Education Journal (LICEJ). Volume 1, Issue 4, Dec. 2010.

Appiah, F. B. (2002). A study of photography development in first year university studdents’

communication skills’ essays. Unpublished M.Phil Thesis, Department of English,

University of Cape Coast.

Bell, T. (1998). Extensive reading: Why? And how? [On-line]. Internet TESL Journal, 4(12).

Chan, A. (2010). Toward a Taxonomy of Written Errors: Investigation Into the Written

Errors of Hong Kong Cantonese ESL Learners. TESOL Quarterly. 44 (2).

Chief Examiner’s Report (2007 – 2010). WAEC http://waeconline.org.ng/elearning/English/Enqlmain.html. July 12, 2012).

Dako, W. (2009). Examining the impact of the [process approach to the teaching and

writing of composition in Grace Presbyterian Senior High School, Tema.

Unpublished M.A Thesis. University of Ghana.

Dogbey, 2012). Effects of students’ reading problem on academic performance in Salvation

Army Senior High School, Akim Wenchi (SASEC). Unpublished MED

Administratration and Management Thesis, UEW.

External Examiner’s Report on Ewe Language Essay, (2012 & 2013). UEW, Winneba.

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (1998). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and

Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ferris, D., & Hedgcock, J. (2004). Teaching ESL Composition: Purpose, Process, and

Practice. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Forson B. E. (2007). Students’ pidgin english (SPE): A Neo- Ghanaian English in vitro (a

description of non-standard English of Ghanaian University students). ‘Unpublished

PhD thesis; University of Ghana, Legon May, 2007.

Gyasi, W. K., Nartey, T. A., Coker, W. (2011). A preliminary Report on First Year

University Students’ Knowledge of Basic Grammar: the case of Department of

Communication Studies, UCC. Unpub.

Haliday, M.A.K & Hassan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman,

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3586466. Dec. 1, 2012.

Heller, M. (1999). Reading-Writing Connections: From Theory to Practice. Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hinkel, E. (2004). “Rhetorical Features of Text: Cohesion and Coherenceâ€, Teaching

Academic ESL Writing: Practical Techniques in Vocabulary and Grammar. Lawrence

Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey, p.265.

Kaplan, R, & Grabe, W (2002). A modern history of written discourse analysis. Journal of

second language writing, 17 (3), 191-192.

Krista, L. (2012). Investigating Cohesion and Coherence Discourse Strategies of Chinese

Students with Varied Lengths of Residence in Canada. TSL Canada Journal TSL Du

Canada Vol, 29 Special Issue 6, 2012 (pp.167).

Kurt, G. & Atay, D. (2007). The effects of peer feedback on the writing anxiety of

prospective Turkish teachers of EFL. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education,

(1), 12-23.

Lee, C. (2004). Seeing is Understanding: Improving Coherence in Students' Writing. The

Internet TESL Journal, X (7), http://iteslj.org/. 21/11/2014

Lee, S. (2006). Teaching EFL Writing in the University: Related Issues, Insights, and

Implications. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 16 (1).

Leki (Eds.), Reading in the composition classroom: Second language perspectives (pp. 33-

. Boston: Heinle.

Leki, I. (1991). Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing

pedagogies. TESOL Quarterly, 25(1).

Nartey-Larwe, S. (1981). Practical methods for English students. Accra: Semnat Books.

Dag, R. (2013). English for academic purposes. NY: TU-CHEMNTZ .

Rice, J. K. (2003). Teacher quality: Understanding the effectiveness of teacher attributes.

Economic Policy Institute, 1(1).

Scordaras, M. (2003). English language learners’ revision process in a college composition

class. Dissertation Abstracts International, 64(8), 2815.

Tsareva, Anastasia (2010). Grammatical Cohesion in argumentative essays of Norwegian

and Russian learners. M.A Thesis, University of Ohio.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.