CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PYTHON DANCE IN SOUTH EAST OF NIGERIA SEPTEMBER 2017 OR A DOCTRINE OF NECESSITY?
Abstract
It is a notorious fact, Python Dance was carried out in the South Eastern part of Nigeria in September 2017. Abia State to be precise. Prior to this time the army informed the public via the media and stated that the President deployed the military under the powers conferred on him by section 218 of the 1999 constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as amended. Under section 217 (2) (c ) by the very wording of the law, the President and the National Assembly evidently share conjunctive powers and responsibilities with regard to the deployment of soldiers to suppress insurrection and act in aid of civil authorities to restore order when called upon to do so. Against this backdrop the President of Nigeria Mohammed Buhari deployed the army to at Abia State. But the question that begs for an answer is “Was there an insurrection in Abia for the Army to quell? Which answer is negative .again was the President applying the “Doctrine of Necessity ? Which is not applicable in the situation because constitutionally the President can as the Commander in Chief of the Army can deploy soldiers. Why then was the Python Dance carried out in Abia State which claimed the lives of thousands of people and mainly the youths. There have been cases of insurrections in Nigeriahow were they addressed or handled? It is an established fact that the indigenous people of Biafra (IPOB) were the targeted group and consequently many of them were killed because they were expressing themselves by requesting for a referendum. The objective of this therefore will be to address the following questions: constitutionality of Python Dance the Doctrine of Necessity, Precedent on the suppression of insurrection in Nigeria, Freedom of expression in other jurisdictions. The work will be concluded by stating there was no need for the Python Dance in Abia State but rather a ploy to wrongly kill people. It is therefore recommended among other things that life is sacred and should be preserved and the President should always bear in mind that it is his responsibility to protect life and property of people under him.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
download pdf on see References
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.