CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS OF SELECTED PIDGIN POLITICAL CAMPAIGN SPEECHES IN NIGERIA
Olachi Enemuo
Abstract
Campaign speeches are one of the avenues through which politicians appeal to the minds of the majority electorate as such they tend to adopt a language that will be understood by the larger number of the people. In recent times politicians have resorted to the use of Nigerian pidgin in delivering political speeches and this isbecause it creates a mutual platform for acceptance. On that note, this paper explores a critically the use of   discursive strategies in political campaign   speeches of two political aspirants of Nigeria selected from the 2015 election campaigns and 2019 campaigns respectively. Norman Fairlough’s three-dimensional framework for discourse analysis was adopted as an analytical model. Particular attention was paid to macro and micro structures that are associated with discourse and the outcome of the analysis revealed the opening remark, the content and the closing remark are present and  make  up  the  macro  structures.  All  the macro  structures  contained persuasive  messages  put  across  to  audience  to  influence  their  political thoughts, beliefs and attitudes. Thecontent of the speeches consisted of recurring   positive   self   representation   of   the   aspirant   and   negative representation of the past administration all these are purposely adopted to gain the people’s mandate. In addition, there were cases of assurance and promises to address the nation’s political; security, economic and social challenges as well as the people’s need. The first person pronouns ‘we’ and ‘I’ and their variants were used as strategies for expressing political ideologies especially the logicof inclusion and exclusion or self and group reference.
References
Adedimeji, Mahfouz. A. “The Politics of Language in Nigeria: A Modest Proposal†A Paper Presented at a National Conference on Democracy and Development Organised by the Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Ilorin, Ilorin. April 2005a 5-7 PrintAustin, John L. How to do Things with Words. Oxford: UP 1962.Print. Chilton, Paul and C. Schaffner, Politics as Text and Talk. Amsterdam: Benjamin Pub. Co. 2002. Print.Chouliaraki, L and Norman Fairclough Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP. 1999. Print. Chouliaraki, L "Political Discourse in the News: Democratizing Responsibility or Aestheticizing Politics" Discourse & Society 11(3) 293-314. 2000. Print. Van Dijk, A.T. Ideology: A multidisciplinary Approach: London, Sage publishers.1993. Print.Fairclough, Norman, Critical discourse analysis and the commodification of Public discourse. In: Discourse and Society 4.2: 133-68.1993. Print.Fairclough, N. Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for social research: Routledge, London and New York. 2003. Print.Fowler, Roger. â€Power†Ed. T.A. van Dijk Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press. 1985 61-83 Print.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2015-2019. IJAAS. All Rights Reserved.
ISSN:2504-8694, E-ISSN:2635-3709Â