EXAMINING THE INTRODUCTION OF COMPANY VOLUNTARY ARRANGEMENT AS A RESCUE MECHANISM UNDER COMPANY AND ALLIED MATTERS ACT (CAMA) 2020

Onyeka Christiana ADUMA, Helen Obiageli OBI

Abstract


Company may become unable not only to pay dividends to its members but also to repay its creditors and by theprovision of repealed CAMA 1990, petitions for winding up could be brought when a company was unable to payits debt, set at a minimum threshold of NGN 2000, and which debts remains unsatisfied after a period of 3 weeksthat a letter of demand had been received. This requirement was pretty much easy to satisfy leading to a flood ofpetitions that ultimately led to the termination of the life of companies. This state of affairs was helped by the factthat besides winding up petitions there were really no intermediate options open to financially distressedcompanies to explore in seeking the resolution of a company’s bad financial situation. As such, the provisions oninsolvency were not aimed at restructuring and preventing the winding up of companies. Indeed, recognizing theneed to promote corporate rescue as well as create enabling condition for investment and improve the ease ofdoing business in Nigeria, CAMA 2020 introduced series of reforms to Nigeria’s legal regime whose underlyingphilosophy arguably is the promotion of corporate rescue as opposed to the termination of the life of the distressedcompanies. The introduction of corporate rescue changed the narrative of resolving insolvency in Nigeria as itpriorities corporate rescue above winding up. This paper therefore examined company voluntary arrangement asone of the rescue mechanisms introduced by CAMA 2020 with a view to finding out the shortcomings of the saidrescue mechanism. The paper found out that company voluntary arrangement under CAMA 2020 is notaccompanied by any moratorium on enforcement actions. The absence of a stay on the enforcement of creditors’rights may hinder a company that is facing financial distress from adopting this scheme for corporate rescue.Consequently, creditors may unilaterally pursue claims or enforcement actions while the company voluntaryarrangement is ongoing and the writers therefore recommended the provision of moratorium which ensures thatthe process is not torpedoed by the creditors.

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.