INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND POLICE BRUTALITY: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF UNITED STATES AND NIGERIA

Abstract

Police brutality is a widespread issue globally, prompting the international community to enact human rights legislation to safeguard citizens from such misconduct. This comparative investigation evaluates the efficacy of international human rights law in addressing police brutality in the United States and Nigeria. By scrutinizing legal frameworks and case studies, this study reveals that both nations have adopted international human rights standards, yet their enforcement has been inconsistent. In the United States, the absence of a national human rights institution and the reluctance of law enforcement agencies to hold themselves accountable hinder progress. Conversely, in Nigeria, incomplete implementation of international human rights treaties, coupled with police force inadequacies, leads to abuse. Despite these obstacles, the study identifies promising approaches, such as the deployment of body cameras and the establishment of civilian oversight boards, which have the potential to enhance police accountability. Furthermore, it underscores the pivotal role played by civil society organizations in advocating for human rights and pressuring governments to be accountable for their actions. Ultimately, the study concludes that the effectiveness of international human rights law in combatting police brutality hinges on robust national institutions and the political determination to enforce these standards.