THE PRAGMATIC THEORY OF TRUTH: A DEFENSE AND RECONCILIATION

Abstract

This work submits that the Pragmatic Theory of Truth is a viable theory of truth based on its emphasis on the notion of practical judgment and usefulness. Pragmatism has become an interesting philosophical discourse among intellectuals such as Charles Sander Peirce, William James, John Dewey; and F. S. C. Schiller among others pushing the thesis that whatever works and is useful is true. The focus of the thesis is the critical examination of the Pragmatic theory of truth particularly on how it has so far been able to resolve the questions surrounding the nature of truth. A conceptual analysis approach was adopted in the study, breaking down and scrutinizing ideas and beliefs, asking fundamental questions, and providing probable answers with the hope of determining whether indeed the Pragmatic Theory of Truth can be presented as a viable way of defining whatever is true. Pragmatists have always insisted that whatever is called truth needs to be relevant rather than merely independent of those creating or granting them true value. That conveys the greatest strength of the Pragmatic Theory of Truth specifically its ability to remain dynamic and fluctuating according to real-world application of new knowledge and information, while still allowing for a realistic criterion of lasting truth.